Browsing Extension of Time by Issue Date
Now showing items 1-6 of 6
-
MARTIN FREDRICK RAJAB VS. ILEMELA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ANOTHER CIVIL APPEAL NO. 197 OF 2019.
(THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, MWANZA., 2022-07-18)i) Parties are bound by their pleadings and can only succeed according to what he has averred in his plaint and proved in evidence; hence he is not allowed to set up a new case. the appellant was required to parade evidence ... -
ABDUL IBRAHIM VS. AYUBU MWALEMBA AND THE REGISTERED TRUSTEE OF BAKWATA CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 642/06 OF 2021.
(THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, MBEYA., 2022-10-05)1.With great respect, the preliminary objection which concerns with time bar to the present application is misconceived. Frankly speaking, I did not understand if Mr. Mwanri meant it that, an application for extension of ... -
VODACOM TANZANIA LIMITED VS. INNOCENT DANIEL NJAU CIVIL APPEAL NO. 60 OF 2019.
(THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, DAR ES SALAAM., 2022-10-07)1. Equally in the circumstances of the present case where the appellant alleges that the trial court had no jurisdiction to determine the matter placed before it. In our view, such illegality could not be left unnoticed ... -
JUBILEE INSURANCE COMPANY (T) LIMITED VS. MOHAMED SAMEER KHAN CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 439/01 OF 2020.
(THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, DAR ES SALAAM., 2022-10-10)Held; No good reasons have been advanced by the applicant to justify the inordinate delay of more than 13 months from 07.08.2019 when the notice of appeal was lodged to 08.10. 2020 when the instant application was filed. it ... -
BRAZAFRIC ENTERPRISES LIMITED VS. KADERES PEASANTS DEVELOPMENT (PLC). CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 421/08 OF 2021.
(THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, DAR ES SALAAM., 2022-10-11)1. I find that narration of sequence of events alone does not constitute good cause for extension of time, as correctly, in my view, stated by the counsel for the respondent 2. In the light of the above decision, I find ... -
ALEX MSAMA MWITA VS. EMMANUEL NASUZWA KITUNDU AND ANOTHER CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 538/17 OF 2020.
(THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, DAR ES SALAAM., 2022-10-20)(i) The applicant did not comply with the mandatory requirement of the law which requires service of the notice of motion to be done within fourteen (14) days from the date of filing and this omission as the court have ...
