Court of Appeal of Tanzania: Recent submissions
Now showing items 61-80 of 558
-
CATS NET LIMITED VS. TANZANIA COMMUNICATION REGULATORY AUTHORITY CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 526/01 OF 2020.
(THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, DAR ES SALAAM., 2022-10-04)1.The assertion on Mr. Cosatta's sickness becomes insignificant because even if it is true that he was sick to the extent of not being able to enter appearance, still he was supposed to so inform the Court before or at the ... -
BYTRADE TANZANIA LIMITED VS. ASSENGA AGROVET COMPANY LIMITED AND ANOTHER CIVIL APPEAL NO. 64 OF 2018.
(THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, MOSHI., 2022-10-07)(i) The true principle of promissory estoppel is where one party has by his words or conduct made to the other a dear and unequivocal promise which is intended to create legal relations or effect a legal relationship to ... -
MARTIN FREDRICK RAJAB VS. ILEMELA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ANOTHER CIVIL APPEAL NO. 197 OF 2019.
(THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, MWANZA., 2022-07-18)i) Parties are bound by their pleadings and can only succeed according to what he has averred in his plaint and proved in evidence; hence he is not allowed to set up a new case. the appellant was required to parade evidence ... -
BULYANHULU GOLD MINES LIMITED VS. PASCHARY ANDREW STANNY CIVIL APPEAL NO. 281 OF 2021.
(THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, SHINYANGA., 2022-07-21)The court was on the view that it is appropriate, to lay ground as for this Court's position generally, on issues of taking evidence from witnesses in all courts. Before taking evidence from a witness in a court of law, ... -
STATE OIL TANZANIA LIMITED VS. EQUITY BANK TANZANIA LIMITED AND ANOTHER CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 426/16 OF 2022
(THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, DAR ES SALAAM., 2022-11-15)(i) Even if the respondent would have written the letter of reminder to the registrar of the high court within 14 days after expiry of 90 days still, he would not have supplied the requested copy of the proceedings the ... -
LEONARD DOMINIC RUBUYE t/a RUBUYE AGROCHEMICAL SUPPLIES VS. YARA TANZANIA LIMITED CIVIL APPEAL NO. 219 OF 2018.
(THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, DAR ES SALAAM., 2022-07-11)(i). It is a well settled position that the onus of proving existence or non-existence of any fact lies on the party asserting its existence or non-existence and in civil cases proof is at balance of probabilities. (ii) The ... -
BYTRADE TANZANIA LIMITED VS. ASSENGA AGROVET COMPANY LIMITED AND ANOTHER CIVIL APPEAL NO. 64 OF 2018.
(THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, MOSHI., 2022-10-07)(i) The true principle of promissory estoppel is where one party has by his words or conduct made to the other a dear and unequivocal promise which is intended to create legal relations or effect a legal relationship to ... -
LAWRENCE MAGESA t/a JOPEN PHARMACY VS. FATUMA OMARY AND ANOTHER CIVIL APPEAL NO. 333 OF 2019
(THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, DAR ES SALAAM., 2022-10-05)(i) We wish to preface our discussion by observing that this being a first appeal, we are entitled to review the evidence on record to satisfy ourselves whether the findings by the trial court were correct. This task is ... -
STATE OIL TANZANIA LIMITED VS. EQUITY BANK TANZANIA LIMITED AND ANOTHER CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 426/16 OF 2022
(THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, DAR ES SALAAM., 2022-11-15)(i) Even if the respondent would have written the letter of reminder to the registrar of the high court within 14 days after expiry of 90 days still, he would not have supplied the requested copy of the proceedings the ... -
COMPUTER LOGIX LIMITED AND ANOTHER VS. ZAMZAM SHADADIISSA AND SEIF ISSACCIVIL APPLICATION NO. 538/01 OF 2018. FIKIRINI (Administrators of the esof the late FIKIRINI ISSA KOCHO) tate
(THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, DAR ES SALAAM., 2022-07-29)1.Exclusion of time spent in preparation and supply of a certified copy of proceedings apply only to an appeal, not an application. Thus, the provision of Rule 90(1) can not be invoked where the applicant fails to lodge ... -
ALEX MSAMA MWITA VS. EMMANUEL NASUZWA KITUNDU AND ANOTHER CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 538/17 OF 2020.
(THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, DAR ES SALAAM., 2022-10-20)(i) The applicant did not comply with the mandatory requirement of the law which requires service of the notice of motion to be done within fourteen (14) days from the date of filing and this omission as the court have ... -
JACKLINE HAMSON GHIKAS VS. MLLATIE RICHIE A SSEY CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 656/01 OF 2021.
(THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, DAR ES SALAAM., 2022-07-15)i)a preliminary objection must satisfy three conditions viz; one, the point of law raised must either be pleaded or must arise as a clear implication from the proceedings; two, that it must be a pure point of law which ... -
TANGANYIKA WATTLE COMPANY LIMITED VS. DOLPHIN BAY CHEMICALS (PTY) LTD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 521/16 OF 2020.
(THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, DAR ES SALAAM., 2022-08-16)(i) When all requisite conditions are met the Court has to grant the stay of execution. (ii) The application which has not contested, has merit. -
METHUSELA ENOKA VS. NATIONAL MICROFINANCE BANK LTD CIVIL APPEAL No. 266 OF 2019.
(THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, MWANZA., 2022-07-18)(i) Appeal is time barred but the appellantis entitled to exclusion under section 19(2) (3) of the Act without necessarily attaching any document to the memorandum of appeal. (ii) The exclusion is automatic as long as ... -
STATE OIL TANZANIA LIMITED VS. EQUITY BANK TANZANIA LIMITED AND ANOTHER CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 426/16 OF 2022
(THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, DAR ES SALAAM., 2022-11-15)(i) Even if the respondent would have written the letter of reminder to the registrar of the high court within 14 days after expiry of 90 days still, he would not have supplied the requested copy of the proceedings the ... -
VOLTALIA S. A. FRANCE VS. NEXTGEN SOLAWAZI LIMITED CIVIL APPEAL NO. 272 OF 2019
(THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, DAR ES SALAAM., 2022-08-15)(i) In the instance the Registrar of the High Court miscalculated the days spent in preparing and supplying the documents to the appellant the Certificate of delay is invalid. (ii) More often than not, the Court denied ... -
CATS NET LIMITED VS. TANZANIA COMMUNICATION REGULATORY AUTHORITY CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 526/01 OF 2020
(THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, DAR ES SALAAM., 2022-10-04)(i) The assertion on Mr. Cosatta's sickness becomes insignificant because even if it is true that he was sick to the extent of not being able to enter appearance, still he was supposed to so inform the Court before or at ... -
MARY AGNES MPELUMBE (in her capacity as Administratix of the estates of the late Isaya Simon Mpelumbe VS. SHEKHA NASSER HAM AD. CIVIL APPEAL NO. 136 OF 2021.
(THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA,DAR ES SALAAM., 2021-11-04)1. We are also guided by the basic rule that he who alleges has the burden of proof as per section 110 of the Evidence Act, Cap. 6 R.E. 2019. 2.Standard of proof in a civil case is on a preponderance of probabilities, ... -
PRIME CATCH (EXPORTS) LIMITED AND 4 OTHERS VS. DIAMOND TRUST BANK TANZANIA LIMITED CIVIL APPEAL NO. 273 OF 2019.
(THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, DAR ES SALAAM., 2022-10-03)1. Therefore, the appellants were denied their fundamental right to be heard in what culminated into a summary judgment against them. 2. On the basis of what we have endeavored to discuss above, we find the appeal is ... -
EXIM BANK TANZANIA LIMITED VS. YAHAYA HAMISI MUSA (As the Administrator of the Estate of the Late HAMISI MUSA MOHAMED t/a AND ANOTHER CIVIL APPEAL NO. 275 OF 2019.
(THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA, DAR ES SALAAM., 2022-09-28)1. In the light of the stated position of the law, although a suit preferred against a dead person is a nullity it is as well incompetent and not capable of being dismissed. Given the circumstances, the proper remedy herein ...
